In addition to reading this Study Guide, you should read the following textbook sections and articles as well as view the YouTube video:
Alkin, M. C., & King, J. A. (2016). The historical development of evaluation use. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(4), 568-579. (pdf) |
Canadian Evaluation Society (2022), Annual conference – C2022 Theme home page. |
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (pp. 3-63). White Plains, NY: Longman. |
Levin-Rozalis, M. (2003). Evaluation and research: Differences and similarities. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 18(2), 1-31 |
Sterling, E. J,, Betley, E., Gomez, A. et al. (2017). Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 209 (pp. 159-171). |
Boute, D. (2013, Nov. 13). Introduction to program evaluation |
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (pages 94-210). White Plains, NY: Longman |
21st Century Teacher (2016, May 23). Consumer oriented approach to evaluation |
Buzun-Miller, M. (2015, Sept. 19). The CIPP Model of Evaluation |
Deurbrouck-Penney, J. (2105, July 12). Participant oriented evaluation approaches 2015 |
Kucha, P. (2016, Jan. 30). Program oriented evaluation approaches |
Owen, J. M. (2007). Program evaluation; Forms and approaches (3rd ed.), pp. 1-62; 169-292. New York: Guilford Press. The above reading is included in your course materials package. |
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (pp. 340-452). White Plains, NY: Longman |
Dilshad, R. M., & Latif, M. I. (2013). Focus group interview as a tool for qualitative research: An analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 33(1), 191-198 |
Searle, M. J., & Shulha, l. M. (2016). Capturing the imagination: Arts-informed inquiry as a method in program evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 31(1), 34-60. (pdf) |