SOCI 365: Sociology of Deviance (Rev. 5) Report a Broken Link

Sociology 365: Sociology of Deviance provides a broad overview of the sociological study of rule-breaking. It looks at broad questions about rule-breaking that have also been important in other academic disciplines and that have been examined by non-specialist authors and thinkers, as well. Philosophers, theologians, historians, and psychologists have all attempted to answer questions such as, “Who breaks rules?” and “Why do people break rules?” Sociology 365 asks those same questions, but also focuses on other issues that may not have been addressed. For instance, Sociology of Deviance will also ask such questions such as, “What are rules?” “Who makes rules?” and  “Why are some rules more important than others?”

Unit 1: Beginning—The Sociology of Deviant Behaviour


Unit 7: Social Disorganization and Cities


Required Reading
Hunter, Albert. 1980. “Why Chicago? The Rise of the Chicago School of Urban Social Science.” The American Behavioral Scientist 24(2):215–227.
Kubrin, Charis E. and Ronald Weitzer. 2003. New Directions in Social Disorganization Theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 40(4):374–402.

You need only read pages 374 to 379, up to the section that begins with “Reconsidering Culture.”

Optional and Highly Recommended Reading
Sampson, Robert J. and W. Byron Groves. (1989). “Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 94(4):774–802.

You need only read pages 774 to 782, up to the section that begins with “Data and Methodology.”

Unit 8: Social Structure and Anomie


Required Reading
Rosenfeld, Richard. 1989. “Robert Merton’s Contributions to the Sociology of Deviance.” Sociological Inquiry 59(4):453–466.
Optional Reading
Featherstone, Richard and Mathieu Deflem. 2003. “Anomie and Strain: Context and Consequences of Merton’s Two Theories.” Sociological Inquiry 73(4):471–489.

Unit 9: Differential Association and Cultural Theories


Required Reading
Cressey, Donald R. 1960. “The Theory of Differential Association: An Introduction.” Social Problems 8(1):2–6.
Akers, Ronald L. 1996. “Is Differential Association/Social Learning Cultural Deviance Theory?” Criminology 34(2):229–247.

Unit 10: Subcultural Theory, Social Control Theory, and Social Reaction Theories


Required Reading
Cloward, Richard A. 1959. “Illegitimate Means, Anomie, and Deviant Behavior.” American Sociological Review 24(2):164–176.
Wiatrowski, Michael D., David B. Griswold and Mary K. Roberts. 1981. “Social Control Theory and Delinquency.” American Sociological Review 46(5): 525–541.
Holstein, James. 2009. “Defining Deviance: John Kitsuse’s Modest Agenda.” American Sociologist 40(1/2): 51–60.

Unit 11: Back to the Basics—Postmodern and Postcultural Theories


Required Reading
Vilhjalmsson, Runar and Thorolfur Thorlindsson. 2002. “Central Issues in Sociology: Globalization, Stratification, and Gender and Deviance.” Acta Sociologica 45(1): 3–6.
Lyman, Standard M. 1995. “Without Morals or Mores: Deviance in Postmodern Social Theory.” International Journal of Politics, Culture & Society 9(2): 197–236.

Read pages 197 to 208.

Unit 12: The Future of the Sociology of Deviance


Required Reading
Best, Joel. 2006. “Whatever Happened to Social Pathology? Conceptual Fashions and the Sociology of Deviance.” Sociological Spectrum 26(6): 533–546.
Goode, Erich. 2002. “Does the Death of the Sociology of Deviance Claim Make Sense?” American Sociologist 33(3): 107–118.

Assignment 1: Research Proposal